I was thinking about the universe and the anomaly of the spins. Like, why should there be spinning solar systems, spinning galaxies, spinning planets and so on? Imagine our standard image of the Big Bang; it’s one of a virtually instantaneous creation of matter, rapidly expanding. If this is a uniform creation scenario (and why could it be anything else if created from a point instant?) then matter should only be being expelled outwards in a uniform manner, like an expanding fog of matter. And I thought “why spin?”. There was nothing to induce a spin, nothing to impart angular momentum, and yet here we are with most things we can see spinning. Why? It isn’t a rational behaviour. So, the only implication I could work out was that the spin must have been there at the start, and yet a singular point start couldn’t\/shouldn’t have spin as there was nothing to impart a spin – although simplistic, a spin in one direction ought to have equal spins in the other direction, and recent investigations have revealed an imbalance in left\/right spins in the universe, thus even more showing an inherent universe with spin. My conclusion is that the universe was created from two (or more, possibly) proto-universe items colliding at an angle (not directly head on), imparting spin on the now unstable situation that initiated the Big Bang. Thus the universe was created with inherent spin and the associated vortexes and another spin anomalies. Well, that’ll do for an initial theory – now for the mathematicians to work out the numbers and either confirm, deny or modify this proposal \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n
1\/11\/2015<\/p>\n
Ian<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
I was thinking about the universe and the anomaly of the spins. Like, why should there be spinning solar systems, spinning galaxies, spinning planets and so on? Imagine our standard image of the Big Bang; it’s one of a virtually … Continue reading